“Misreading” Calvin: The Question of World-Making in the Texts of Settler Colonialism and Theology

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’s account of European settler colonialism in the United States notably focuses on Calvinist communities as a primary catalyst in rationalizing land seizure, identifying covenantal theology as supporting settler claims to sovereignly held indigenous lands. This article argues tha...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Koh, SueJeanne (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2023
In: Political theology
Year: 2023, 卷: 24, 发布: 7, Pages: 706-719
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B USA / 殖民主义 / 加尔文主义 / 清教徒前辈移民 / 开拓者 / 美洲原住民
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KBQ North America
KDD Protestant Church
Further subjects:B Calvin
B indigenous studies
B Covenant
B Settler Colonialism
B Genre
B Accommodation
在线阅读: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
实物特征
总结:Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’s account of European settler colonialism in the United States notably focuses on Calvinist communities as a primary catalyst in rationalizing land seizure, identifying covenantal theology as supporting settler claims to sovereignly held indigenous lands. This article argues that while she rightly identifies a correspondence between divine providence and a settler colonial logic of replacement, a vertical orientation, her analysis of theology as settler colonialism can be completed through a recourse to a rhetorical and literary analysis of Calvin’s Institutes. That is, settler colonialism also possesses a horizontal component, a logic of replicability that describes the temporal and spatial movement of settler colonialism. To make this argument I turn to Michelle Sanchez and Ford Lewis Battles’ respective explorations of literary genre and the language of accommodation. My analysis points to how Calvin’s covenantal theology can conjure the “imagined community” that is then embodied as settler colonialism. I end by suggesting that further careful articulation of the nexus between theology and settler colonialism is necessary for us to reckon the present and ongoing possibilities of inhabiting space and sharing life together, settler and indigenous alike.
ISSN:1743-1719
Contains:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2023.2212474