An Extended Refutation of Doctrinal Correlates in John 8–9
The doctrinal continuum between ancestral merits and rewards and punishments is well established in Second Temple Judaism and is discernible in John 8–9. Following Philo of Alexandria’s questioning of these doctrinal correlates, the Johannine chapters are subjected to a theological-rhetorical analys...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2024
|
| Dans: |
Novum Testamentum
Année: 2024, Volume: 66, Numéro: 1, Pages: 18-37 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Johannesevangelium 8
/ Bibel. Johannesevangelium 9
/ Bibel. Johannesevangelium 9,1-5
/ Ancêtres
/ Salaire
/ Peine
/ Philo, Alexandrinus 25 avant J.-C.-40
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament NCA Éthique VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Fourth Gospel
B Philo of Alexandria B modes of refutation B ancestral merits B rewards and punishments B Johannine polemic |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | The doctrinal continuum between ancestral merits and rewards and punishments is well established in Second Temple Judaism and is discernible in John 8–9. Following Philo of Alexandria’s questioning of these doctrinal correlates, the Johannine chapters are subjected to a theological-rhetorical analysis focused on the transitional passage (9:1–5). The passage is here seen not as an introduction to a new theme but as corollary to the preceding chapter(s), having a duo-directional significance, linking a two-part refutation of invariably related doctrines: ancestral merits and rewards and punishments. The rejection or refutation of the latter affirms the rejection or refutation of the former, and vice versa. The Johannine chapters in question have a thematic and dialectical connection; they constitute a substantial part of the broader, interrelated polemic of the Fourth Gospel. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5365 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10061 |