An Extended Refutation of Doctrinal Correlates in John 8–9

The doctrinal continuum between ancestral merits and rewards and punishments is well established in Second Temple Judaism and is discernible in John 8–9. Following Philo of Alexandria’s questioning of these doctrinal correlates, the Johannine chapters are subjected to a theological-rhetorical analys...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Terian, Abraham 1942- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Brill 2024
Em: Novum Testamentum
Ano: 2024, Volume: 66, Número: 1, Páginas: 18-37
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Bibel. Johannesevangelium 8 / Bibel. Johannesevangelium 9 / Bibel. Johannesevangelium 9,1-5 / Ancestrais / Salário / Pena / Philo, Alexandrinus 25 a.C.-40
Classificações IxTheo:HC Novo Testamento
NCA Ética
VA Filosofia
Outras palavras-chave:B Fourth Gospel
B Philo of Alexandria
B modes of refutation
B ancestral merits
B rewards and punishments
B Johannine polemic
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:The doctrinal continuum between ancestral merits and rewards and punishments is well established in Second Temple Judaism and is discernible in John 8–9. Following Philo of Alexandria’s questioning of these doctrinal correlates, the Johannine chapters are subjected to a theological-rhetorical analysis focused on the transitional passage (9:1–5). The passage is here seen not as an introduction to a new theme but as corollary to the preceding chapter(s), having a duo-directional significance, linking a two-part refutation of invariably related doctrines: ancestral merits and rewards and punishments. The rejection or refutation of the latter affirms the rejection or refutation of the former, and vice versa. The Johannine chapters in question have a thematic and dialectical connection; they constitute a substantial part of the broader, interrelated polemic of the Fourth Gospel.
ISSN:1568-5365
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10061