An Extended Refutation of Doctrinal Correlates in John 8–9
The doctrinal continuum between ancestral merits and rewards and punishments is well established in Second Temple Judaism and is discernible in John 8–9. Following Philo of Alexandria’s questioning of these doctrinal correlates, the Johannine chapters are subjected to a theological-rhetorical analys...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2024
|
| В: |
Novum Testamentum
Год: 2024, Том: 66, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 18-37 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel. Johannesevangelium 8
/ Bibel. Johannesevangelium 9
/ Bibel. Johannesevangelium 9,1-5
/ Предки
/ Заработная плата (мотив)
/ Штраф <мотив>
/ Philo, Alexandrinus 25 до н.э.-40
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | HC Новый Завет NCA Этика VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Fourth Gospel
B Philo of Alexandria B modes of refutation B ancestral merits B rewards and punishments B Johannine polemic |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The doctrinal continuum between ancestral merits and rewards and punishments is well established in Second Temple Judaism and is discernible in John 8–9. Following Philo of Alexandria’s questioning of these doctrinal correlates, the Johannine chapters are subjected to a theological-rhetorical analysis focused on the transitional passage (9:1–5). The passage is here seen not as an introduction to a new theme but as corollary to the preceding chapter(s), having a duo-directional significance, linking a two-part refutation of invariably related doctrines: ancestral merits and rewards and punishments. The rejection or refutation of the latter affirms the rejection or refutation of the former, and vice versa. The Johannine chapters in question have a thematic and dialectical connection; they constitute a substantial part of the broader, interrelated polemic of the Fourth Gospel. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5365 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685365-bja10061 |