Brain Pioneers and Moral Entanglement: An Argument for Post-trial Responsibilities in Neural-Device Trials

We argue that in implanted neurotechnology research, participants and researchers experience what Henry Richardson has called “moral entanglement.” Participants partially entrust researchers with access to their brains and thus to information that would otherwise be private, leading to created intim...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Goering, Sara (Author) ; Brown, Andrew I. (Author) ; Klein, Eran (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 2024
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2024, Volume: 54, Issue: 1, Pages: 24-33
Further subjects:B neurotechnology
B moral entanglement
B post-trial obligation
B Dependence
B Risk
B Vulnerability
B neural device
B research ethics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1881547213
003 DE-627
005 20240225055505.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240225s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/hast.1566  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1881547213 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1881547213 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Goering, Sara  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Goering, Sara 
245 1 0 |a Brain Pioneers and Moral Entanglement: An Argument for Post-trial Responsibilities in Neural-Device Trials 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We argue that in implanted neurotechnology research, participants and researchers experience what Henry Richardson has called “moral entanglement.” Participants partially entrust researchers with access to their brains and thus to information that would otherwise be private, leading to created intimacies and special obligations of beneficence for researchers and research funding agencies. One of these obligations, we argue, is about continued access to beneficial technology once a trial ends. We make the case for moral entanglement in this context through exploration of participants’ vulnerability, uncompensated risks and burdens, depth of relationship with the research team, and dependence on researchers in implanted neurotechnology trials. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a research ethics 
650 4 |a neurotechnology 
650 4 |a Risk 
650 4 |a Dependence 
650 4 |a post-trial obligation 
650 4 |a Vulnerability 
650 4 |a moral entanglement 
650 4 |a neural device 
700 1 |a Brown, Andrew I.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Klein, Eran  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Hastings Center  |t The Hastings Center report  |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971  |g 54(2024), 1, Seite 24-33  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346551  |w (DE-600)2067369-3  |w (DE-576)258761822  |x 1552-146X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:54  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:24-33 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1566  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1566  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 54  |j 2024  |e 1  |h 24-33 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4490792328 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1881547213 
LOK |0 005 20240225055505 
LOK |0 008 240225||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-02-24#AA18B7D0C24B3701403589073503AFF287BBE784 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw