Who owns religion? Scholars, Sikhs and the public sphere
This paper revisits the question “Who Owns Religion?”, in the context of a recent analysis of debates in religious studies, marked by controversy and friction between members of religious traditions and scholars writing about those traditions. Habermas’s concept of a public sphere is at the center o...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Routledge
2024
|
| В: |
Religion
Год: 2024, Том: 54, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 297–319 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Public Sphere
B Sikhs B Religious Studies B Habermas B History B Identity B Universities |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | This paper revisits the question “Who Owns Religion?”, in the context of a recent analysis of debates in religious studies, marked by controversy and friction between members of religious traditions and scholars writing about those traditions. Habermas’s concept of a public sphere is at the center of an analysis by Laurie Patton that uses six case studies, including one involving the Sikh tradition. The paper reviews this conceptual framing and the accompanying analysis, provides a reconsideration of the Sikh case, which pertains to the construction of religious boundaries in that tradition, and draws more general lessons, including the functioning of academia as well as the contextual appropriateness of the concept of the public sphere. It argues that “eruptions” in the public sphere can be reduced by improvements in academic knowledge production, to provide a better foundation for navigating differences in modes of reasoning, or between the religious and the secular. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1096-1151 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2023.2289404 |