Ancient states and infrastructural power: Europe, Asia, and America
While ancient states are often characterized in terms of the powers that they claimed to possess, this book argues that they were in fact fundamentally weak, both in the exercise of force outside of war and in the infrastructural and regulatory powers that such force would, in theory, defend. In Anc...
| Outros Autores: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Print Livro |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Serviço de pedido Subito: | Pedir agora. |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Philadelphia
PENN, University of Pennsylvania Press
[2017]
|
| Em: | Ano: 2017 |
| Coletânea / Revista: | Empire and after
|
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Estado
/ Poder
/ Antiguidade
|
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
State, The
History To 1500
B Political Science History To 1500 B Comparative government B Coletânea de artigos B Civilization, Ancient B Power (Social sciences) History To 1500 |
| Acesso em linha: |
Inhaltsverzeichnis (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | While ancient states are often characterized in terms of the powers that they claimed to possess, this book argues that they were in fact fundamentally weak, both in the exercise of force outside of war and in the infrastructural and regulatory powers that such force would, in theory, defend. In Ancient States and Infrastructural Power a distinguished group of contributors examines the ways in which early states built their territorial, legal, and political powers before they had the capabilities to enforce them. The volume brings Greek and Roman historians together with scholars of early Mesopotamia, late antique Persia, ancient China, Visigothic Iberia, and the Inca empire to compare various models of state power across regional and disciplinary divisions. How did the polis become the body that regulates property rights? Why did Chinese and Persian states maintain aristocracies that sometimes challenged their autocracies? How did Babylon and Rome promote the state as the custodian of moral goods? In worlds without clear borders, how did societies from Rome to Byzantium come to share legal and social identities rooted in concepts of territory? From the Inca Empire to Visigothic Iberia, why did tributary practices reinforce territorial ideas about membership? Contributors address how states first claimed and developed the ability to delineate territory, promote laws, and establish political identity; and they investigate how the powers that states appropriated came to be seen as their natural and normal domain |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 0812249313 |