A Targumic Interpretation in the Mishnah?: Or a Case of Mistaken Identity?
Interpretations of Exod. 17.11 and Num. 21.9 juxtaposed in Mishnah Rosh Ha-Shanah 3.8 bear strong resemblances to the Fragment Targum of these verses, while exhibiting certain marked differences. The Mekhilta also juxtaposes these verses using language close to that of mRH 3.6 without, however, emp...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Brill
2013
|
| Em: |
Aramaic studies
Ano: 2013, Volume: 11, Número: 2, Páginas: 197-210 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Arameu
/ Fonte
/ Judaísmo
/ Cristianismo
/ Targum
/ Arameu
/ Bibel
/ Tradução
/ Literatura rabínica
/ Mishnah
/ Iustinus, Martyr, Heiliger -165
/ Mose, Personagem bíblico
/ Malerba, Luigi 1927-2008, Il serpente
/ Amalequitas
/ Festa do Ano Novo
/ Polêmica
/ Barnabae epistula
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | HA Bíblia HB Antigo Testamento TC Período pré-cristão |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Fragment Targum
Mishnah Rosh ha-Shanah
Epistle of Barnabas
Justin Martyr’s Apology
Jewish-Christian polemic
Moses’ stance against Amalek
Moses and bronze serpent
|
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Não eletrônico
|
| Resumo: | Interpretations of Exod. 17.11 and Num. 21.9 juxtaposed in Mishnah Rosh Ha-Shanah 3.8 bear strong resemblances to the Fragment Targum of these verses, while exhibiting certain marked differences. The Mekhilta also juxtaposes these verses using language close to that of mRH 3.6 without, however, employing terminology common to Targum and Mishnah. The same verses are explicated in tandem by the early Christian writers ‘Barnabas’ and Justin Martyr. The article explores pre-Christian interpretations of these verses and examines the wording of the Mishnah and the Targum, concluding that these texts can be regarded as extended ‘conversations’ between exegetes of different persuasions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5227 |
| Obras secundárias: | In: Aramaic studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455227-13110209 |