Acts and Christian Beginnings: A Review Essay

This article reviews recent claims that the Acts of the Apostles should be dated in the second century, not in the first century as most scholars currently argue. It notes a range of works that make such claims in passing, but focuses on the multi-authored work Acts and Christian Beginnings, and on...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gregory, Andrew F. 1971- (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage [2016]
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2016, Volume: 39, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-115
Review of:Acts and Christian beginnings: the Acts seminar report (Salem, OR : Polebridge Press, 2013) (Gregory, Andrew F.)
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Acts of the Apostles / Dating
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Further subjects:B date
B Book review
B Josephus
B Marcion
B Paul
B Acts
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article reviews recent claims that the Acts of the Apostles should be dated in the second century, not in the first century as most scholars currently argue. It notes a range of works that make such claims in passing, but focuses on the multi-authored work Acts and Christian Beginnings, and on some of the publications on which its authors depend. Particular attention is given to the work of Richard Pervo and his case that Acts used both Josephus and a collection of Paul’s letters, and his claim that this requires a second-century date for Acts. The article notes the strength of the case for Luke’s use of both Josephus’ Antiquities and some of Paul’s letters, but questions whether this requires a second-century date, and reflects on the wider issues that are at stake.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X16660916