Three Books of Daniel: Plurality and Fluidity among the Ancient Versions
This essay demonstrates that the book of Daniel is not a fixed but fluid text, a collection of traditions that developed over centuries and locations. The three major extant ancient versions of Daniel, represented by the Hebrew/Aramaic Masoretic Text and the “Old Greek” and “Revised Greek” translati...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
[2017]
|
| In: |
Interpretation
Year: 2017, Volume: 71, Issue: 2, Pages: 143-153 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Azariah
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This essay demonstrates that the book of Daniel is not a fixed but fluid text, a collection of traditions that developed over centuries and locations. The three major extant ancient versions of Daniel, represented by the Hebrew/Aramaic Masoretic Text and the “Old Greek” and “Revised Greek” translations, together participate in a complex dance of genres as they move between legend, folk-tale, prayer and song, vision and apocalypse, novella and saint’s life. A greater appreciation of this multiplicity and fluidity complicates our understanding of biblical texts in ways that can enrich interpretation and interfaith dialogue. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2159-340X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0020964316688077 |