Ethics, Human Oocytes and the Teleology of the Body: An Appreciation of Gilbert Meilaender’s Work

Gilbert Meilaender has been an important contributor to the field of bioethics for decades. His insistence that there is a natural teleology of the body that should constrain ambitions of the will in bioethics deserves careful attention. This article examines the idea of a natural teleology of the b...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lauritzen, Paul (Author)
Contributors: Meilaender, Gilbert 1946- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage [2017]
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 133-143
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B mitochondrial replacement techniques
B oocyte
B ROBERTSON, John
B Gilbert Meilaender
B Bioethics
B reproductive technology
B Meilaender, Gilbert
B Teleology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Gilbert Meilaender has been an important contributor to the field of bioethics for decades. His insistence that there is a natural teleology of the body that should constrain ambitions of the will in bioethics deserves careful attention. This article examines the idea of a natural teleology of the body as it applies to human oocytes. It argues that approaching human eggs in terms of their telos rather than their moral status is useful. The article examines how Meilaender deploys the idea of a natural teleology to reject John Robertson’s work on assisted reproduction, particularly his preoccupation with procreative liberty. Finally, the article raises questions about the sharp contrast Meilaender draws between teleology and intentionality.
ISSN:0953-9468
Reference:Kritik in "Friendly Rejoinders (2017)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0953946816684075