Theolatry and the Making-Present of the Nonrepresentable

In this essay, I place Buber’s thought in dialogue with Eckhart. Each understood that the theopoetic propensity to imagine the transcendent in images is no more than a projection of our will to impute form to the formless. The presence of God is made present through imaging the real, but imaging the...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Wolfson, Elliot R. 1956- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Brill 2017
In: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Anno: 2017, Volume: 25, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 5-35
Altre parole chiave:B Dialogue Eckhart ecstasy Ḥasidism Gustav Landauer mysticism realization theolatry
Accesso online: Volltext (Verlag)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:In this essay, I place Buber’s thought in dialogue with Eckhart. Each understood that the theopoetic propensity to imagine the transcendent in images is no more than a projection of our will to impute form to the formless. The presence of God is made present through imaging the real, but imaging the real implies that the nonrepresentable presence can only be made present through the absence of representation. The goal of the journey is to venture beyond the Godhead in light of which all personalistic depictions of the divine person are rendered idolatrous. Perhaps this is the most important implication of Eckhart’s impact on Buber, an insight that may still have theopolitical implications in a world where too often personifications of the God beyond personification are worshipped at the expense of losing contact with an absolute person that cannot be personified absolutely.
ISSN:1477-285X
Comprende:In: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341275