Reason and Justification in the Mishnah: Exploring the Significance of the ‘Half-Damage’ Rule

Are the norms of Jewish religious law grounded in reason and values? In classical rabbinic discourse, justifications for laws – whether by direct reasoning (sevara), or more commonly, by scriptural derivation (Midrash) – are prevalent in most extant collections, where they serve to express underlyin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zohar, Noʿam 1954- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2013
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2013, Volume: 2, Issue: 3, Pages: 250-262
Further subjects:B Judaism revelation and reason public reason halakhah mishnah midrash hermeneutics goring ox
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:Are the norms of Jewish religious law grounded in reason and values? In classical rabbinic discourse, justifications for laws – whether by direct reasoning (sevara), or more commonly, by scriptural derivation (Midrash) – are prevalent in most extant collections, where they serve to express underlying values. Justifications are rare, however, in the core document of the tradition, the Mishnah. But the absence of overt justification should not be taken to signify a lack of an underlying value-laden worldview. Careful analysis of an unusual mishnaic clause reveals a message about the reasonableness and significance of the rabbinic “half-damage” rule, sharply divergent from the plain meaning of the biblical text, which is perceived as inherently unfair. This serves as an instructive example of how exploring the Mishnah as a work of literary art can reveal the reason and values of halakhic norms.
ISSN:2212-4810
Contains:In: Journal of law, religion and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22124810-00203003