Who Is Afraid of Religious Freedom? The Right to Freedom of Religion and Belief and Its Critics

This article answers the claim that it is impossible to implement the right to religious freedom in a coherent, non-discriminatory way. It relies on the notions of “embedded evenhandedness” and “particular universalities” to build a two-pronged approach to freedom of religion. On the one hand, this...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ferrari, Silvio (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill, Nijhoff 2016
In: Religion and human rights
Year: 2016, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 224-249
Further subjects:B Religion belief freedom rights evenhandedness
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562116738
003 DE-627
005 20220604142228.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/18710328-12341304  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562116738 
035 |a (DE-576)492116733 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492116733 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ferrari, Silvio  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Who Is Afraid of Religious Freedom? The Right to Freedom of Religion and Belief and Its Critics 
264 1 |c 2016 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article answers the claim that it is impossible to implement the right to religious freedom in a coherent, non-discriminatory way. It relies on the notions of “embedded evenhandedness” and “particular universalities” to build a two-pronged approach to freedom of religion. On the one hand, this approach accepts that history and culture provide the particular framework within which the right of freedom of religion is embedded. On the other, it recognizes that the claim of evenhandedness that is inbuilt in this right can overcome the limitations of a specific context and open it to new ways to understand and implement the right itself. This tension between the universal dimension of the right to freedom of religion and its particular implementations allows affirming the possibility of religious freedoms, whose different manifestations are better protected by collecting them under the umbrella of the same legal category than by apportioning them between different rights. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Religion  |x belief  |x freedom  |x rights  |x evenhandedness 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Religion and human rights  |d Leiden : Brill, Nijhoff, 2006  |g 11(2016), 3, Seite 224-249  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)518818446  |w (DE-600)2254876-2  |w (DE-576)321221702  |x 1871-0328  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:224-249 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12341304  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 11  |j 2016  |e 3  |h 224-249 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976973857 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562116738 
LOK |0 005 20170808151301 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STG 0 0 |a Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie