Reforming Philosophy of Religion: Some Methodological Cautions
Kevin Schilbrack’s Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are tensions betw...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Anno: 2016, Volume: 28, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 54-67 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Schilbrack
philosophy of religion
methodology
interpretation
Davidson
|
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Edizione parallela: | Elettronico
|
| Riepilogo: | Kevin Schilbrack’s Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are tensions between his defence of these methodologies and the philosophical apparatus he brings to bear in explicating the goals themselves. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Comprende: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341354 |