The State and Marriage: Cut the Connection

I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hill, Daniel J. 1972- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Tyndale House [2017]
En: Tyndale bulletin
Año: 2017, Volumen: 68, Número: 1, Páginas: 95-119
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Matrimonio / Estado / Derecho / Abolición
Clasificaciones IxTheo:NCF Ética sexual
XA Derecho
Otras palabras clave:B Marriage Religious aspects Christianity
B Marriage law
B Peer reviewed
B Church and state
Parallel Edition:Electrónico
Descripción
Sumario:I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance several arguments for this thesis, and then respond to many possible objections. I do not argue for any change in any of the typical Western laws respecting sexual intercourse; in particular, I do not argue for any change in the laws regarding rape, the age of consent to intercourse or intercourse with a minor.
ISSN:0082-7118
Reference:Kritik in "Could Marriage Be Disestablished? (2017)"
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin