The State and Marriage: Cut the Connection
I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance s...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Print Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Tyndale House
[2017]
|
En: |
Tyndale bulletin
Año: 2017, Volumen: 68, Número: 1, Páginas: 95-119 |
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Matrimonio
/ Estado
/ Derecho
/ Abolición
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | NCF Ética sexual XA Derecho |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Marriage
Religious aspects
Christianity
B Marriage law B Peer reviewed B Church and state |
Parallel Edition: | Electrónico
|
Sumario: | I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance several arguments for this thesis, and then respond to many possible objections. I do not argue for any change in any of the typical Western laws respecting sexual intercourse; in particular, I do not argue for any change in the laws regarding rape, the age of consent to intercourse or intercourse with a minor. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0082-7118 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Could Marriage Be Disestablished? (2017)"
|
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
|