Multi-Dimensional Consequentialism and Risk
In his new book, The Dimensions of Consequentialism, Martin Peterson proposes a version of multi-dimensional consequentialism according to which risk is one among several dimensions. We argue that Petersons treatment of risk is unsatisfactory. More precisely, we discuss a number of major problems o...
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
---|---|
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Review |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Έτος: 2016, Τόμος: 19, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 49-57 |
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | NCA Ηθική VA Φιλοσοφία |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Κριτική
B Moral Dimension B Risk B Moral aspect B Consequentialism B Martin Peterson |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | In his new book, The Dimensions of Consequentialism, Martin Peterson proposes a version of multi-dimensional consequentialism according to which risk is one among several dimensions. We argue that Petersons treatment of risk is unsatisfactory. More precisely, we discuss a number of major problems of one-dimensional (objective or subjective) consequentialism, and show that none of them disappears with Petersons proposal. In ending our paper, we address the objection that our discussion overlooks the fact that Petersons proposal is not the best version of multi-dimensional consequentialism. Our reply is that the possibilities of improving multi-dimensional consequentialism are very limited as far as risk is concerned. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
Αναφορά: | Kritik in "The Dimensions of Consequentialism (2016)"
|
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-015-9658-5 |