Studying Religion and Trying Theological Applications
John Shook’s paper Are People Born to be Believers? raises many questions, for the scientific study of religion and for philosophy and theology. For reasons of convenience this response distinguishes in the target article between three quite different issues and deals with them separately: first iss...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2017, 卷: 29, 發布: 4/5, Pages: 400-410 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
宗教
/ 天賦觀念
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ 神學家
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AE Psychology of religion FA Theology |
| Further subjects: | B
innatness
cognitive science of religion
epistemology
science and theology
|
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| 總結: | John Shook’s paper Are People Born to be Believers? raises many questions, for the scientific study of religion and for philosophy and theology. For reasons of convenience this response distinguishes in the target article between three quite different issues and deals with them separately: first issue concerns the supposed innateness of religious beliefs, or some precursor of them; second, the possible theological application that such thesis could entail; and third, a more general and methodological issue, concerns the feasibility of a scientific knowledge about religion that can be disentangled from other sources of religious insight |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "Are People Born to be Believers, or are Gods Born to be Believed? (2017)"
Kommentar in "Reply to Commentaries on “Are People Born to be Believers, or are Gods Born to be Believed?” (2017)" |
| Contains: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341401 |