Slavery and Asceticism in John of Ephesus’ Lives of the Eastern Saints


This article examines the phenomenon of slavery – both institutional (being enslaved to other human beings) and divine (being enslaved to God) – and its relationship to asceticism in John of Ephesus’ (507-589 CE) Lives of the Eastern Saints. The study first examines the nature of institutional slave...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: de Wet, Chris (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2017
Dans: Scrinium
Année: 2017, Volume: 13, Numéro: 1, Pages: 84-113
Classifications IxTheo:CB Spiritualité chrétienne
CH Christianisme et société
KAD Haut Moyen Âge
KCA Monachisme; ordres religieux
KCD Hagiographie
Sujets non-standardisés:B asceticism
 Liber graduum
 Byzantine slavery
 hagiography
 John of Ephesus
 late antiquity
 Lives of the Eastern Saints
 monasticism
 slave of God
 slavery
 Syriac

Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:This article examines the phenomenon of slavery – both institutional (being enslaved to other human beings) and divine (being enslaved to God) – and its relationship to asceticism in John of Ephesus’ (507-589 CE) Lives of the Eastern Saints. The study first examines the nature of institutional slavery in Lives. It is shown that John is somewhat indifferent with regards to institutional slaves – they are either depicted as symbols of the wealth and decadence of the elite, or part of the ascetic households of the virtuous. In both cases, though, the slaves serve to illuminate the vice or virtue of the masters (wicked masters have scores of slaves serving them, while virtuous masters are so exceptional that even their slaves follow the ascetic lifestyle). Slavery is no impediment to the ascetic vocation – slaves have a part to play in John vision of asceticism as social outreach. John’s views on divine slavery are less conventional. In Lives, the ideal slave of God (ʿabdā d’Allāhā) is not one who busies him- or herself with self-centered acts of self-mortification, but rather one who supports and cares for those who suffer, the poor, and the marginalized. In this regard, labor and service to society become the prime virtues of John’s slave of God. By promoting this quasi-utilitarian stance on divine slavery, John also positions himself against earlier traditions such as those in Liber graduum that view worldly labor and service as unfitting to the life of Perfection.

ISSN:1817-7565
Contient:In: Scrinium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00131p09