A Critique of and Alternative to Nancey Murphy's Christian Physicalism
For some time now, Nancey Murphy has been a major voice on behalf of a certain form of Christian physicalism. This is a part of her project of reconciling science with Christian faith. In what follows, I shall state and criticize the three central components of her Christian physicalism, followed by...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2016]
|
| Em: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2016, Volume: 8, Número: 2, Páginas: 107-128 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Murphy, Nancey C. 1951-
/ Teologia
/ Fisicalismo
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | For some time now, Nancey Murphy has been a major voice on behalf of a certain form of Christian physicalism. This is a part of her project of reconciling science with Christian faith. In what follows, I shall state and criticize the three central components of her Christian physicalism, followed by a presentation of a dualist alternative along with a clarification of its advantages over Murphy-style physicalism. |
|---|---|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v8i2.60 |