The Crucial Importance of Nancey Murphy's Deployment of Lakatos's Methodology for Theology and Science
Russell's paper explores the astonishing fruitfulness of Nancey Murphy's use of Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science in the field of "theology and science." Murphy's work can be used to choose between competing theologies according to the theologians' willingness t...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Electronic/Print 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2017, 卷: 15, 发布: 4, Pages: 401-410 |
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism CF Christianity and Science NBD Doctrine of Creation NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
quantum mechanics
B creation and cosmology B philosophy of science B Imre Lakatos B creative mutual interaction B Evolutionary Biology B non-interventionist objective divine action B Cosmic Christ |
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (doi) |
| 总结: | Russell's paper explores the astonishing fruitfulness of Nancey Murphy's use of Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science in the field of "theology and science." Murphy's work can be used to choose between competing theologies according to the theologians' willingness to engage with science, their ability to continue the engagement as scientific theories change, and their ability to make empirical predictions based on this engagement. Topics range from creation and cosmology, the "cosmic Christ", and non-interventionist objective divine action in quantum mechanics and evolution. Russell has followed Murphy's lead and used Lakatos to place theology and science into "creative mutual interaction" (CMI). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6700 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Response to Early, Russell, Brown, and Newson (2017)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1369754 |