A Critique of and Alternative to Nancey Murphy's Christian Physicalism
For some time now, Nancey Murphy has been a major voice on behalf of a certain form of Christian physicalism. This is a part of her project of reconciling science with Christian faith. In what follows, I shall state and criticize the three central components of her Christian physicalism, followed by...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2016]
|
| В: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2016, Том: 8, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 107-128 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Murphy, Nancey C. 1951-
/ Богословие (мотив)
/ Физикализм
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | For some time now, Nancey Murphy has been a major voice on behalf of a certain form of Christian physicalism. This is a part of her project of reconciling science with Christian faith. In what follows, I shall state and criticize the three central components of her Christian physicalism, followed by a presentation of a dualist alternative along with a clarification of its advantages over Murphy-style physicalism. |
|---|---|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v8i2.60 |