First Person and Third Person Reasons in Religious Epistemology
In this paper I argue that there are two kinds of epistemic reasons. One kind is irreducibly first personal - what I call deliberative reasons. The other kind is third personal - what I call theoretical reasons. I argue that attending to this distinction illuminates a host of problems in epistemolog...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2011]
|
| En: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Año: 2011, Volumen: 3, Número: 2, Páginas: 285-304 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Sumario: | In this paper I argue that there are two kinds of epistemic reasons. One kind is irreducibly first personal - what I call deliberative reasons. The other kind is third personal - what I call theoretical reasons. I argue that attending to this distinction illuminates a host of problems in epistemology in general and in religious epistemology in particular. These problems include (a) the way religious experience operates as a reason for religious belief, (b) how we ought to understand religious testimony, (c) how religious authority can be justified, (d) the problem of religious disagreement, and (e) the reasonableness of religious conversion. |
|---|---|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v3i2.397 |