The Crucial Importance of Nancey Murphy's Deployment of Lakatos's Methodology for Theology and Science
Russell's paper explores the astonishing fruitfulness of Nancey Murphy's use of Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science in the field of "theology and science." Murphy's work can be used to choose between competing theologies according to the theologians' willingness t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electronic/Print Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
Em: |
Theology and science
Ano: 2017, Volume: 15, Número: 4, Páginas: 401-410 |
Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião CF Cristianismo ; Ciência NBD Criação NBF Cristologia |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
quantum mechanics
B creation and cosmology B philosophy of science B Imre Lakatos B creative mutual interaction B Evolutionary Biology B non-interventionist objective divine action B Cosmic Christ |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) |
Resumo: | Russell's paper explores the astonishing fruitfulness of Nancey Murphy's use of Imre Lakatos's philosophy of science in the field of "theology and science." Murphy's work can be used to choose between competing theologies according to the theologians' willingness to engage with science, their ability to continue the engagement as scientific theories change, and their ability to make empirical predictions based on this engagement. Topics range from creation and cosmology, the "cosmic Christ", and non-interventionist objective divine action in quantum mechanics and evolution. Russell has followed Murphy's lead and used Lakatos to place theology and science into "creative mutual interaction" (CMI). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6700 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Response to Early, Russell, Brown, and Newson (2017)"
|
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1369754 |