Militant or pluralist secularism? The European Court of Human Rights facing religious diversity

The increased diversity of contemporary societies has multiplied the claims to accommodate this new plurality, particularly that of religions, in different contexts of everyday life such as workplaces, schools and public offices. As a result, in the last decade, there have been an increasing number...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Medda-Windischer, Roberta 1968- (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Routledge [2017]
In: Religion, state & society
Year: 2017, 卷: 45, 发布: 3/4, Pages: 216-231
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte / 世俗主义 / 宗教多元主义
Further subjects:B Diversity
B Religious Symbols
B European Court of Human Rights
B Freedom Of Religion
B Accommodation
B Secularism
在线阅读: Volltext (Verlag)
实物特征
总结:The increased diversity of contemporary societies has multiplied the claims to accommodate this new plurality, particularly that of religions, in different contexts of everyday life such as workplaces, schools and public offices. As a result, in the last decade, there have been an increasing number of cases before the European Court of Human Rights concerning religious diversity, indicating the importance of this topic in the European arena. In some recent cases on the use of religious symbols in public places, public schools and universities, the Court has frequently sustained a strict form of secularism or even a sort of intolerant secularism or enlightenment fundamentalism. However, in other cases the Court has discarded a militant form of secularism following a more pluralist, open secularism model. This contribution argues that, often criticised for being arbitrary and unpredictable, the Court's approach to religion is pragmatic, but it must strengthen the role of the state as a promoter of tolerance.
ISSN:1465-3974
Contains:Enthalten in: Religion, state & society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2017.1389507