Proselytism and Ostentation: a Critical Discourse Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law on Religious Symbols

Abstract This article focuses on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) case law about religious symbols (N=27) from 2001 to 2018, exploring the following questions: What discourses does the ECtHR employ in cases about religious symbols? How do ECtHR’s discourses about religious symbols evolve...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Evolvi, Giulia (Author) ; Gatti, Mauro 1984- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: Journal of religion in Europe
Year: 2021, Volume: 14, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 162-188
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte / Christianity / Islam / Symbol / Religion / Secularism / Discourse / History 2001-2018
IxTheo Classification:AX Inter-religious relations
KBA Western Europe
RJ Mission; missiology
XA Law
Further subjects:B Islam
B Case law
B Critical Discourse Analysis
B Religious Symbols
B European Court of Human Rights
B Christianity
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Abstract This article focuses on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) case law about religious symbols (N=27) from 2001 to 2018, exploring the following questions: What discourses does the ECtHR employ in cases about religious symbols? How do ECtHR’s discourses about religious symbols evolve in time? The data is innovatively analyzed through critical discourse analysis and leads to two findings: first, the ECtHR tends to endorse ‘Christian secularism,’ considering Christian symbols as compatible with secularism but not Muslim symbols; second, ECtHR discourses occasionally become more favorable to Muslim applicants over time, but the evolution of case law is not linear.
ISSN:1874-8929
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of religion in Europe
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18748929-20211524