Compassion for Living Creatures in Indian Law Courts

The Constitution of India through an amendment of 1976 prescribes a Fundamental Duty 'to have compassion for living creatures'. The use of this notion in actual legal practice, gathered from various judgments, provides a glimpse of the current debates in India that address the relationship...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tarabout, Gilles 1948- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: MDPI [2019]
En: Religions
Año: 2019, Volumen: 10, Número: 6, Páginas: 1-21
Otras palabras clave:B Buddhism
B Compassion
B Animal welfare
B court cases
B India
Acceso en línea: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Descripción
Sumario:The Constitution of India through an amendment of 1976 prescribes a Fundamental Duty 'to have compassion for living creatures'. The use of this notion in actual legal practice, gathered from various judgments, provides a glimpse of the current debates in India that address the relationships between humans and animals. Judgments explicitly mentioning 'compassion' cover diverse issues, concerning stray dogs, trespassing cattle, birds in cages, bull races, cart-horses, animal sacrifice, etc. They often juxtapose a discourse on compassion as an emotional and moral attitude, and a discourse about legal rights, essentially the right not to suffer unnecessary pain at the hands of humans (according to formulae that bear the imprint of British utilitarianism). In these judgments, various religious founding figures such as the Buddha, Mahavira, etc., are paid due tribute, perhaps not so much in reference to their religion, but rather as historical icons-on the same footing as Mahatma Gandhi-of an idealized intrinsic Indian compassion.
ISSN:2077-1444
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.3390/rel10060383