I, the Fool: A "Canonical" Reading of Proverbs 26:4-5

Although Prov 26:4 says that one should not answer a fool, the immediately following verse advises the opposite. This article suggests that if one thinks through all of the different aspects of the issue raised by these two verses and their immediate context, the logical solution is to follow v. 5 a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schwáb, Zoltán S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: The Pennsylvania State University Press 2016
In: Journal of theological interpretation
Year: 2016, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 31-50
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Further subjects:B Theology
B Preludes
B Wisdom
B Eyes
B Political debate
B Political Discourse
B Bible. Sprichwörter 26,4-5
B Proverbs
B Old Testament
B Hope
B Verbs
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Although Prov 26:4 says that one should not answer a fool, the immediately following verse advises the opposite. This article suggests that if one thinks through all of the different aspects of the issue raised by these two verses and their immediate context, the logical solution is to follow v. 5 and answer the fool. This is not only good for the fool but also benefits the whole society. This does not mean, however, that v. 4 is mistaken when it claims that by answering a fool one becomes a fool. Nonetheless, becoming a fool is not an entirely negative development. It serves the spiritual needs of the one who answers a(nother) fool. The second half of this article compares this interpretation with the postbiblical "fool for Christ" tradition, then discusses some hermeneutical questions raised by the interpretation.
ISSN:2576-7933
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of theological interpretation
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/26373985