Two Epistemological Arguments for the Existence of God
In this article I outline two epistemological theistic arguments. The first one starts from the dilemma between our strong conviction that we possess some knowledge of the world and the belief that there are some serious reasons which undermine it. In my opinion theism opens the possibility of the w...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
| В: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2018, Том: 10, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 21-30 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Эпистемологический контекстуализм
/ Доказательство существования Бога
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии NBC Бог |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Epistemology
B theistic arguments B Natural Theology B God |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | In this article I outline two epistemological theistic arguments. The first one starts from the dilemma between our strong conviction that we possess some knowledge of the world and the belief that there are some serious reasons which undermine it. In my opinion theism opens the possibility of the way out of the dilemma. The second argument depends on the premise that in every time every worldly thing is actually perceived or known. I support it by four considerations and claim that the simplest explanation of the epistemic non-loneliness' of the world is the existence of the Supreme Cogniser. |
|---|---|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i1.1889 |