Theodicy: A Response to Christopher Southgate

This article is a critical and appreciative interaction with Christopher Southgate's theodicy and theology of glory. I critique in particular his rejection of all dualist moves in theodicy. I question why Southgate can ascribe evil to some human actions, many of which are automatic and unconsci...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Creegan, Nicola Hoggard (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2018]
Dans: Zygon
Année: 2018, Volume: 53, Numéro: 3, Pages: 808-820
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Southgate, Christopher 1953- / Théodicée
Classifications IxTheo:NBC Dieu
Sujets non-standardisés:B Christopher Southgate
B Natural Evil
B Theodicy
B Glory
B Poetry
B Sonali Deraniyagala
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article is a critical and appreciative interaction with Christopher Southgate's theodicy and theology of glory. I critique in particular his rejection of all dualist moves in theodicy. I question why Southgate can ascribe evil to some human actions, many of which are automatic and unconscious, but not to any other level or form of consciousness. I argue that he may rely too heavily on rational scientific categories, which are not sufficient in themselves to carry the weight of key theological concepts. His use of poetry is powerful and suggestive, but in the end, he may not give it enough epistemic weight.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contient:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12456