Evolution and Theodicy: How (not) to Do Science and Theology
This article uses Christopher Southgate's work and engagement with other scholars on the topic of evolutionary theodicy as a case study in the dialogue of science and Christian theology. A typology is outlined of ways in which the voices of science and the Christian tradition may be related in...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2018]
|
| В: |
Zygon
Год: 2018, Том: 53, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 821-835 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Southgate, Christopher 1953-
/ Эволюция
/ Теодицея (мотив)
/ Естественные науки (мотив)
/ Богословие (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии CF Христианство и наука NBC Бог |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Theology
B Christopher Southgate B Natural Evil B Creation B Christianity B Evolutionary Biology B Эволюция |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This article uses Christopher Southgate's work and engagement with other scholars on the topic of evolutionary theodicy as a case study in the dialogue of science and Christian theology. A typology is outlined of ways in which the voices of science and the Christian tradition may be related in a science-theology dialogue, and examples of each position on the typology are given from the literature on evolution and natural evil. The main focus is on Southgate's evolutionary theodicy and the alternative proposal by Neil Messer. By bringing these two accounts into dialogue, some key methodological issues are brought into focus, enabling some conclusions to be drawn about the range and limits of fruitful methodological possibilities for dialogues between science and Christian theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12435 |