Theodore vs. the "Arians" and the Parable of Humanity's Creation: A Syriac Fragment of Theodore of Mopsuestia's Commentary on Genesis 1.26

For many historians and theologians, there are primarily two things that come to mind at the mention of Theodore of Mopsuestia: his relationship to the christological controversy of the fifth century and his aversion to allegorical interpretation. A fragment from a Syriac version of his Commentary o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rambow, George F. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [2017]
In: Journal of early Christian studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 25, Issue: 2, Pages: 231-254
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Theodorus, Mopsuestenus 352-428 / Genesis / Commentary / Creation / Human being / Christology
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
NBD Doctrine of Creation
NBF Christology
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:For many historians and theologians, there are primarily two things that come to mind at the mention of Theodore of Mopsuestia: his relationship to the christological controversy of the fifth century and his aversion to allegorical interpretation. A fragment from a Syriac version of his Commentary on Genesis contains evidence that contributes to a broader perspective. In this paper I present the first translation of a portion of this fragment in a modern language. I then offer an interpretive analysis. The results of the analysis call attention to Theodore's concern not only with exploring the realm of Christology, but also with promoting Nicene theology. They also bring to light one instance in which Theodore found non-literal—and possibly even allegorical—interpretation acceptable.
ISSN:1086-3184
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of early Christian studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/earl.2017.0020