Disjunction in Paul: Apocalyptic or Christomorphic? Comparing the Apocalypse of Weeks with Galatians
This article compares the Apocalypse of Weeks with Galatians to examine whether the motif of creatio e contrario is apocalyptic. While reviewing the themes of revelation, salvation and eschatology in each text, it argues that creatio e contrario is absent from and theologically foreign to the Apocal...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Jahr: 2018, Band: 64, Heft: 1, Seiten: 64-80 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Bibel. Galaterbrief
/ Zehnwochenapokalypse
/ Schöpfung
/ Gegensatz
/ Disjunktion (Logik)
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | HC Neues Testament HD Frühjudentum NBC Gotteslehre NBD Schöpfungslehre |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Apocalyptic
B Galatians B disjunction B Apocalypse of Weeks B creatio e contrario B Enoch B Paul |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article compares the Apocalypse of Weeks with Galatians to examine whether the motif of creatio e contrario is apocalyptic. While reviewing the themes of revelation, salvation and eschatology in each text, it argues that creatio e contrario is absent from and theologically foreign to the Apocalypse; by contrast, this motif permeates Galatians, not because Paul retrieves it from the apocalypses but because for him the divine economy is shaped by the disjunctive, e contrario history of the crucified and risen Christ. Thus, creatio e contrario should be classified not as apocalyptic but as christomorphic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688517000170 |