Aquinas on the Nature of the Human Soul: Starting Points in Article 2 of On Spiritual Creatures

While examining how Aquinas defends his account of the human soul in Article 2 of On Spiritual Creatures, I will point out the difficulties that arise in determining the nature of the human soul when the very starting question is formulated in the manner of Article 2's question: "Can a spi...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Soerensen, Jennifer L. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Philosophy Documentation Center [2017]
В: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Год: 2017, Том: 91, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 391-398
Другие ключевые слова:B AVERROES, 1126-1198
B Spirituality
B Соул
B Avicenna, 980-1037
B THOMAS, Aquinas, Saint, ca. 1225-1274
Online-ссылка: Volltext (doi)
Описание
Итог:While examining how Aquinas defends his account of the human soul in Article 2 of On Spiritual Creatures, I will point out the difficulties that arise in determining the nature of the human soul when the very starting question is formulated in the manner of Article 2's question: "Can a spiritual substance be united to a body?" This way of examining the human soul--beginning by considering pure spiritual substantiality and then considering whether it is possible that spiritual substance can relate to a body--reveals an intractable tension which Aquinas would have a difficult time resolving. However, this tension is avoided when the method for discussing the nature of the soul is a bottom-up analysis of the human composite and its operations, which is precisely how Aquinas argues in his Answer. The dialectic between these two different sorts of questioning in Article 2 represents the key opposition between Aquinas's arguments regarding the soul and those of Averroes and Avicenna.
ISSN:2153-8441
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/acpq201761121