About chronos and kairos: on Agamben's interpretation of Pauline temporality through Heidegger

One of the key concepts in Giorgio Agamben’s reading of Paul is temporality. In this article, Delahaye examines this concept. Delahaye shows that Agamben’s understanding of messianic temporality hinges on the opposition between kairos and chronos, which Agamben takes for granted. He consequently tra...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Delahaye, Ezra 1988- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Digitale/Stampa Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Taylor & Francis [2016]
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Anno: 2016, Volume: 77, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 85-101
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Agamben, Giorgio 1942- / Paulus, Apostel, Heiliger / Messianismo / Temporalità / Heidegger, Martin 1889-1976
Notazioni IxTheo:HC Nuovo Testamento
VA Filosofia
Altre parole chiave:B Agamben, Giorgio (1942-) Il tempo che resta
Accesso online: Accesso probabilmente gratuito
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:One of the key concepts in Giorgio Agamben’s reading of Paul is temporality. In this article, Delahaye examines this concept. Delahaye shows that Agamben’s understanding of messianic temporality hinges on the opposition between kairos and chronos, which Agamben takes for granted. He consequently traces this opposition back to Heidegger’s influence on Agamben. This leads Delahaye to conclude that messianic temporality can be understood as a variation on Heidegger’s idea of ecstatic temporality.
ISSN:2169-2327
Comprende:Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1244016