About chronos and kairos: on Agamben's interpretation of Pauline temporality through Heidegger
One of the key concepts in Giorgio Agamben’s reading of Paul is temporality. In this article, Delahaye examines this concept. Delahaye shows that Agamben’s understanding of messianic temporality hinges on the opposition between kairos and chronos, which Agamben takes for granted. He consequently tra...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Digitale/Stampa Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Anno: 2016, Volume: 77, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 85-101 |
(sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Agamben, Giorgio 1942-
/ Paulus, Apostel, Heiliger
/ Messianismo
/ Temporalità
/ Heidegger, Martin 1889-1976
|
Notazioni IxTheo: | HC Nuovo Testamento VA Filosofia |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Agamben, Giorgio (1942-) Il tempo che resta
|
Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (doi) |
Riepilogo: | One of the key concepts in Giorgio Agamben’s reading of Paul is temporality. In this article, Delahaye examines this concept. Delahaye shows that Agamben’s understanding of messianic temporality hinges on the opposition between kairos and chronos, which Agamben takes for granted. He consequently traces this opposition back to Heidegger’s influence on Agamben. This leads Delahaye to conclude that messianic temporality can be understood as a variation on Heidegger’s idea of ecstatic temporality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1244016 |