‘God's hangman’: James VI, the divine right of kings, and the Devil

This article considers James VI and I's treatise on the divine right of kings, The Trew Law of Free Monarchies (1598), in relation to his earlier treatise on witchcraft Daemonologie (1597). James's articulation of divine right kingship not only served to refute the arguments of his former...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Orr, Donald Alan 1965- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2016]
In: Reformation & Renaissance review
Year: 2016, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 137-154
IxTheo Classification:KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance
KBF British Isles
KDE Anglican Church
NBH Angelology; demonology
SA Church law; state-church law
Further subjects:B Witchcraft
B I / King James VI
B Divine right of kings
B stoic ideal
B Jesuits
B Presbyterians
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This article considers James VI and I's treatise on the divine right of kings, The Trew Law of Free Monarchies (1598), in relation to his earlier treatise on witchcraft Daemonologie (1597). James's articulation of divine right kingship not only served to refute the arguments of his former tutor, George Buchanan (1506-1582), and the Jesuit, Robert Persons (1546-1610), but also served as a bulwark against the perceived threat of the supernatural to his rule. James incorporated the ideal of a stoic subject previously put forward in his Daemonologie into the Trew Law, offering a doctrine of non-resistance that both Catholic and presbyterian subjects were expected to follow. The ideal stoic subject would remain firmly in command of their passions, enduring the ‘curses’ of tyranny or of witchcraft without actively seeking relief for their circumstances.
ISSN:1462-2459
Contains:Enthalten in: Reformation & Renaissance review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2016.1191828