Kristen etik mellem kompromis og radikalitet: om ansvarsetikken som en tredje vej inspireret af K.E. Løgstrup og Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Resumé K. E. Løgstrup’s The Ethical Demand, first published in 1956, has proved to hold insights that give it continued resonance in Scandinavian theology and beyond. Among other things, its rejection of a Christian ethic continues to be debated. Such a critical stance towards Christian ethics can a...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Stampa Articolo |
| Lingua: | Danese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Anis
[2017]
|
| In: |
Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Anno: 2017, Volume: 80, Fascicolo: 2/3, Pagine: 110-126 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Løgstrup, Knud E. 1905-1981
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Etica cristiana
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | KAJ Età contemporanea KBB Area germanofona KBE Scandinavia KDD Chiesa evangelica NCA Etica |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Theological Ethics
B Ethics B Løgstrup B Bonhoeffer B Radicalism B Responsibility B compromise B Christian Ethics |
| Riepilogo: | Resumé K. E. Løgstrup’s The Ethical Demand, first published in 1956, has proved to hold insights that give it continued resonance in Scandinavian theology and beyond. Among other things, its rejection of a Christian ethic continues to be debated. Such a critical stance towards Christian ethics can also be found in Dietrich Bonhoeffer. But in contrast to Løgstrup, he can still endorse a Christian discipleship and the call to bear witness to Christ. By bringing Løgstrup and Bonhoeffer into conversation it can be argued that an ethic of responsibility as a responsive concept can open up for a Christian ethic in a third positionbetween compromise and radicalism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0105-3191 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
|