Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy
In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic (M. J. Murray, N. Hoggard, T. Daugherty). Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Electronic/Print Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
| В: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Год: 2017, Том: 78, Выпуск: 4/5, Страницы: 498-510 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Неокартезианство
/ Теодицея (мотив)
/ Страдание (мотив)
/ Животная этика
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | NBC Бог NCG Экологическая этика; этика мироздания VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Evil
B Theodicy B Animal Suffering B God |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic (M. J. Murray, N. Hoggard, T. Daugherty). Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments (such as free will argument or soul-making theodicy) do not seem able to deal with it. In the first instance, the article aims to provide a brief overview of the main arguments sustained by theists regarding animal suffering, and secondly to provide an evaluation of such arguments which might be useful for further research on this topic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2017.1356742 |