Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy
In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic (M. J. Murray, N. Hoggard, T. Daugherty). Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electronic/Print Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
Em: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Ano: 2017, Volume: 78, Número: 4/5, Páginas: 498-510 |
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Neocartesianismo
/ Teodiceia
/ Sofrimento
/ Ética animal
|
Classificações IxTheo: | NBC Deus NCG Ética ecológica ; ética da criação VA Filosofia |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Evil
B Theodicy B Animal Suffering B God |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) |
Resumo: | In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic (M. J. Murray, N. Hoggard, T. Daugherty). Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments (such as free will argument or soul-making theodicy) do not seem able to deal with it. In the first instance, the article aims to provide a brief overview of the main arguments sustained by theists regarding animal suffering, and secondly to provide an evaluation of such arguments which might be useful for further research on this topic. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2017.1356742 |