Restitution of lost property in the tannaitic and amoraic Halakhah: a preliminary philosophical study of the forming of a conception
This paper explores the development of a particular talmudic halakhic theme—the restitution of lost property—through the philosophical prism of Hilary Putnam's distinction between concepts and conceptions. This distinction holds that one can affirm a set of concepts without commitment to the un...
| Autres titres: | Hebrew Article hshvt ʾvdh vhlkhhhtnʾy h ṿhʾmṿrʾyt ׃tsyṿn fylṿmṿfy rʾ shṿnyvhthṿṿ th shl ḳṿnmftsyh |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Hébreu |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
[2005]
|
| Dans: |
AJS review
Année: 2005, Volume: 29, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-51 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Incommensurability of scientific theories
B Conceptualization |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | This paper explores the development of a particular talmudic halakhic theme—the restitution of lost property—through the philosophical prism of Hilary Putnam's distinction between concepts and conceptions. This distinction holds that one can affirm a set of concepts without commitment to the underlying conceptions from which they are drawn. The focus here is upon substantial discrepancies between tannaitic and amoraic authorities in the presentation of the halakhot of restitution of lost property. These discrepancies testify to a significant change in the underlying conceptual framework of tannaitic and amoraic halakhic thinking on this topic. |
|---|---|
| Description: | English abstract: S. 129 |
| ISSN: | 1475-4541 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0364009405000103 |