"Anti-theodicy" and Antitheodicies

The article reviews different antitheodicies in response to Toby Betenson's article "Anti-Theodicy". Antitheodicies involve rejecting the position that God or meaning exist only, if evils have justifying morally sufficient reasons. The article builds on Betenson's division into m...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Snellman, Lauri (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2019]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, 卷: 11, 發布: 1, Pages: 201-211
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B 神義論 / 拒絶
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Betenson
B philosophical methodology
B Toby
B Antitheodicy
B problem of evil
B Metaphysics
在線閱讀: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (KW)
Volltext (doi)
實物特徵
總結:The article reviews different antitheodicies in response to Toby Betenson's article "Anti-Theodicy". Antitheodicies involve rejecting the position that God or meaning exist only, if evils have justifying morally sufficient reasons. The article builds on Betenson's division into moral and conceptual antitheodicies and his characterization of antitheodicies as a metacritique of the problem of evil. Moral antitheodicies are problematic, as they do not address the key conceptual issues and might end up in question-begging or moralism. Dissolving the problem of evil requires a conceptual antitheodicy that exposes its presuppositions as speculative metaphysics. Religious conceptual antitheodicies help to focus on different ways of sense-making that do not fall into theodicism.
Reference:Kritik in "In Defence of Moralising Anti-Theodicy (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2579