VI. Examining Theological Appropriations of Problematic Historical Dissent

This contribution will examine several theological methods used to understand morally egregious examples of historical dissent in the Catholic Church. From the 1600s to the late 1800s, large numbers of Catholics in the young United States dissented from the Holy See in one particularly egregious man...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros títulos:Theological Roundtable Dissenting Church: New Models for Conflict and Diversity in the Roman Catholic Tradition
Autor principal: Slattery, John P. ca. 21. Jh. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Cambridge Univ. Press [2018]
En: Horizons
Año: 2018, Volumen: 45, Número: 1, Páginas: 149-154
Clasificaciones IxTheo:KAH Edad Moderna
KAJ Época contemporánea
KBQ América del Norte
KDB Iglesia católica
NBN Eclesiología
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Descripción
Sumario:This contribution will examine several theological methods used to understand morally egregious examples of historical dissent in the Catholic Church. From the 1600s to the late 1800s, large numbers of Catholics in the young United States dissented from the Holy See in one particularly egregious manner: their support for and defense of chattel slavery and the Atlantic slave trade. While chattel slavery is universally declared horrific and immoral, its vestiges have not been erased from church history, nor has its influence been eradicated in the modern experience of Christians in the United States today. After naming the contemporary problem caused by this historical example of dissent and analyzing theological approaches to ameliorate this problem, I will propose a theological-historical approach that may offer better solutions in the future.
ISSN:2050-8557
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Horizons
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/hor.2018.63