What Has Erfurt to Do with Basel? Meister Eckhart and Karl Barth on Preaching
The preacher-theologians Meister Eckhart and Karl Barth negotiate the problem of preaching by developing actualistic accounts of theological language. Whilst the revelational actualism of Barth's analogia fidei is stabilized eschatologically, Eckhart develops an actualized analogia entis that i...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2017]
|
| In: |
Medieval mystical theology
Year: 2017, 卷: 26, 发布: 2, Pages: 96-110 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church KDD Protestant Church RE Homiletics |
| Further subjects: | B
Meister Eckhart
B Karl Barth B actualism analogia entis B Preaching B 信仰模拟 |
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| 总结: | The preacher-theologians Meister Eckhart and Karl Barth negotiate the problem of preaching by developing actualistic accounts of theological language. Whilst the revelational actualism of Barth's analogia fidei is stabilized eschatologically, Eckhart develops an actualized analogia entis that is governed by his distinctive doctrine of creation. As a result of these metaphysical determinations, Barth conceived of an analogy-within-dialectic, whereas Eckhart posits a dialectic-within-analogy, a difference that is correlated with their respective tendency towards voluntarism and intellectualism. Whilst Barth's account of revelation is haunted by the possibility of epistemological violence, Eckhart's 'ontology of peace' struggles to accommodate the real dialectic of sin and suffering. Both struggle to affirm the mediatorial significance of Jesus' human nature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2046-5734 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Medieval mystical theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/20465726.2017.1403582 |