Jacques Dupuis and Chalcedon
This article reexamines Jacques Dupuis's distinction between the action of the Word as such and the action of the Word incarnate. Against recent critics, I argue that Dupuis's Christology is compatible with Chalcedon as interpreted by Leo the Great. I suggest ways in which this Leonine chr...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Sage Publ.
[2019]
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Anno: 2019, Volume: 80, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 271-292 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Dupuis, Jacques 1923-2004
/ Concilio (451 : Chalkedon)
/ Leo, I., Papa 400-461
/ Cristologia
/ Pluralismo religioso
/ Salvezza
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | CC Cristianesimo; religione non cristiana; relazioni interreligiose KAA Chiesa; storia KDB Chiesa cattolica NBF Cristologia NBK Soteriologia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Leo I
B Christology B Maximus the Confessor B Jacques Dupuis B Logos B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Riepilogo: | This article reexamines Jacques Dupuis's distinction between the action of the Word as such and the action of the Word incarnate. Against recent critics, I argue that Dupuis's Christology is compatible with Chalcedon as interpreted by Leo the Great. I suggest ways in which this Leonine christological approach needs corrective amplification, particularly regarding the unity of Christ and the action of Christ in his risen humanity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040563919836241 |