A Kuhnian critique of Hume on miracles
In Part I of "Of Miracles," Hume argues that belief in miracle-testimony is never justified. While Hume's argument has been widely criticized and defended along a number of different veins, including its import on scientific inquiry, this paper takes a novel approach by comparing Hume...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2019]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 86, Issue: 1, Pages: 39-59 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hume, David 1711-1776, Of miracles
/ Miracle
/ Faith
/ Scientific nature
/ Abnormalities
/ Kuhn, Thomas S. 1922-1996
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Miracle
B Thomas Kuhn B David Hume B Miracles B Anomaly B Anomalies |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |