Miracles and Two Accounts of Scientific Laws
Since early modernity, it has often been assumed that miracles are incompatible with the existence of the natural laws utilized in the sciences. This paper argues that this assumption is largely an artifact of empiricist accounts of laws that should be rejected for reasons internal to philosophy of...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2014
|
Em: |
Zygon
Ano: 2014, Volume: 49, Número: 2, Páginas: 323-347 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Free Will
B quantum mechanics B David Hume B Determinism B philosophy of science B Miracles B Empiricism B Science B Divine Action B Causality |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Não eletrônico
|
Resumo: | Since early modernity, it has often been assumed that miracles are incompatible with the existence of the natural laws utilized in the sciences. This paper argues that this assumption is largely an artifact of empiricist accounts of laws that should be rejected for reasons internal to philosophy of science, and that no such incompatibility arises on the most important alternative interpretations, which treat laws as expressions of forces, dispositions, or causal powers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12088 |