Mystery of the Trinity: a Reply to Einar Bøhn
In this journal, Einar Bøhn has proposed a solution to the so-called Trinitarian Paradox. After summarizing the Paradox and Bøhn's proposed solution, I argue that those committed to Christian orthodoxy cannot accept the solution, for three reasons: First, it requires positing more kinds of divi...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Springer Netherlands
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Sophia
Année: 2019, Volume: 58, Numéro: 2, Pages: 301-307 |
Classifications IxTheo: | FA Théologie NBC Dieu VA Philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Trinity
B Many-one identity B Composition as identity |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Résumé: | In this journal, Einar Bøhn has proposed a solution to the so-called Trinitarian Paradox. After summarizing the Paradox and Bøhn's proposed solution, I argue that those committed to Christian orthodoxy cannot accept the solution, for three reasons: First, it requires positing more kinds of divine entity than God and the Persons of the Trinity; second, it is based upon a false assumption; and, finally, the proposed solution amounts at best to a form of obscurantism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-019-0710-0 |