Differentiated Consensus as a Means of Correcting Unilateral Ecclesiological Developments?
The methodology of "differentiated consensus," which was used to arrive at the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification between Lutherans and Catholics in 1999, has led to more progress in 40 years than in the previous five centuries, through reinterpreting certain formulations t...
| Subtitles: | Ecumenical Dialogue Today and Tomorrow |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
The ecumenical review
Year: 2019, Volume: 71, Issue: 3, Pages: 267-279 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church KDD Protestant Church KDJ Ecumenism NBN Ecclesiology |
| Further subjects: | B
Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
B Lutheran World Federation B Roman Catholic Church B differentiated consensus B ecumenical methodology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | The methodology of "differentiated consensus," which was used to arrive at the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification between Lutherans and Catholics in 1999, has led to more progress in 40 years than in the previous five centuries, through reinterpreting certain formulations that were seemingly incompatible, and allowing correction of those doctrinal developments that are unilaterally self-referential and that reach far back in history. To assess the progress made, this article examines the type of doctrinal consensus originally required by the Catholic Church, so as to understand what is new about differentiated consensus and its potential for correcting unilateral doctrinal developments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1758-6623 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The ecumenical review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/erev.12436 |