Deuteronomy as a Translation of Assyrian Treaties

This article evaluates claims that the relationship between the Vassal Treaty of Esarhaddon (VTE) and the book of Deuteronomy (especially chapter 28) can properly be called one of translation. We conduct this study by analyzing the translation style of the bilingual (Akkadian-Aramaic) Tell Fekheriye...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hutton, Jeremy M. 1976- (Autor) ; Crouch, Carly L. 1982- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Mohr Siebeck [2018]
En: Hebrew bible and ancient Israel
Año: 2018, Volumen: 7, Número: 2, Páginas: 201-252
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Bibel. Deuteronomium / Asarhaddon, Assyrien, König -669 a. C. / Tell Fecherije / Inscripción / Vasallidad / Contracto
Clasificaciones IxTheo:BC Antiguo Oriente ; Religión
HB Antiguo Testamento
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:This article evaluates claims that the relationship between the Vassal Treaty of Esarhaddon (VTE) and the book of Deuteronomy (especially chapter 28) can properly be called one of translation. We conduct this study by analyzing the translation style of the bilingual (Akkadian-Aramaic) Tell Fekheriyeh inscription using the theoretical paradigm of Optimal Translation. We argue that the relevant passages of Deuteronomy 28 - those that have been judged as most likely representing direct translation from Akkadian or indirect translation through Aramaic - do not, in fact, show any procedural similarities to the one extensive and definitive exemplar of Akkadian-to-Northwest Semitic translation from antiquity, namely, the Tell Fekheriyeh inscription. Although this conclusion does not rule out more refractory uses of Akkadian treaty texts, it suggests that Deuteronomy's reliance on prior texts was unlikely to have been limited to a single exemplar, and more likely to have been based on a variety of texts within the Akkadian and Northwest Semitic treaty traditions.
ISSN:2192-2284
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Hebrew bible and ancient Israel
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1628/hebai-2018-0014