Response to Jackson, Stratton-Lake, and Schroeder
I argue that Jackson, Stratton-Lake, and Schroeder's objections to my arguments for the error theory in Unbelievable Errors fail. I also argue that our inability to believe the error theory should affect our assessments of these arguments.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2018]
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2018, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 322-341 |
| Further subjects: | B
Belief
B Non-cognitivism B Error Theory B non-reductive realism B reductive realism |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | I argue that Jackson, Stratton-Lake, and Schroeder's objections to my arguments for the error theory in Unbelievable Errors fail. I also argue that our inability to believe the error theory should affect our assessments of these arguments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Willing Belief (2018)"
Kritik von "Necessarily Coextensive Predicates and Reduction (2018)" Kritik von "Naturalism and the Error Theory (2018)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-20181352 |